Don’t blame those who relayed on Israel’s narrative blame the Lebanese silence  

An explosive device detonated near a Lebanese Army patrol in Kafra, leaving several soldiers injured.

Following the incident, Israel quickly issued its own account, claiming that the device was not Israeli and that its forces had never reached the location where the explosion occurred.

Israel’s version should not be treated as fact or repeated without evidence. But for now, it is the only account available.

Where is the Lebanese version? What has the investigation found? And why is the public being left with only one narrative?
The Army Command is quick to issue statements when troops come under Israeli fire, as it should.

Yet when incidents involve explosive devices, weapons depots, or similar cases, official explanations are often brief, delayed, or absent, leaving uncertainty to take over.

This does not mean Hezbollah planted the device to target the Army. It could have been leftover from the war, or previously planted to target Israeli forces. But these remain possibilities, not substitutes for a clear officia